BAkin Bakalim Kimler Kimleri destekliyor.

Degerli Domino Etkisi Uyeleri, Bu mesejim da sizlere domino etkisi tarafindan iletilmeyecek. Ben o yuzden e-mail adreslerini buldugum bu listenin uyelerine iletilerimi ilaveten gonderecegim.   Bu gurupda bol bol  anti-amerikanizm yapildigina, ilimli islamdan ve de baska hususlardan soz edildigine gore, sizlere gonderecegim bu ingilizce yazilarin nerelerde ciktigindan, bu yerlerin kimlere ait oldugundan, basinda kimlerin oldugundan, yazilarin yazarlarinin kim oldugundan ve de tum bunlarin kime hizmet ettiginden ve bu yer ve kisilerin fikirlerinden haberiniz olmasi lazim. Haberiniz yoksa, oturup bilmediginiz konularda ahkam kesmekten vazgecmeniz lazim. Lutfen iletinin ulastigi herkes bu sozlerimi ustune almasin. Lafim bilmedigi konularda insanlara dolma yutturmaya calisanlara.   O yuzden ben size bu yazi nereden alindi, kim yazdi, hangi cikar icin yazdi, hic bir bilgi vermeyecegim. Sizler Allah'in verdigi akli kullaniyorsaniz, zaten anlamaniz lazim.   Turkey and Democracy by Michael Rubin Euro-Atlantic Quarterly March 2008 http://www.meforum.org/1893/turkey-and-democracy   Replace Turkey as a Strategic Partner? by Jonathan Eric Lewis Middle East Quarterly Spring 2006, pp. 45-52 http://www.meforum.org/928/replace-turkey-as-a-strategic-partner      Despite Obama's efforts, Turkish foreign policy seems to be drifting farther away from the United States, especially on issues such as Iran and Sudan.  Su satirlara gozunuzu iyi acin dolma yutmayi sevenler: Since coming to power in 2002, Turkey's Justice and Development Party (AKP) government has made significant changes in Turkish foreign policy. For decades beforehand, Ankara's foreign policy paradigm had centered on the promotion of national interests vested in the West. Lately, however, Turkish public support for and identification with the country's traditional Western allies (the United States, Europe, and Israel) have diminished. In the place of these allies, Ankara has established warm ties with Iran, Sudan, and Russia, and defended Hamas on the world stage.  Previously, Turkish leaders successfully made the case to the public that the country's interests lay with its Western allies, to the point that popular attitudes were swayed in the direction of supporting the United States. Such a tendency, however, has not continued under the AKP, which has often taken an anti-Western stance before the Turkish public. This is, in part, because the party does not seem to consider Turkey part of the West. When Prime Minister Erdogan, who is also the AKP leader, addressed the summit of the Arab League in Khartoum, Sudan, in 2006, he told the attending heads of state that the "developed nations use terror to sell us weapons." 'Strategic Depth,' or Turning Turks toward Anti-Western Countries By implementing a new, sophisticated foreign policy theory called "strategic depth," the AKP has taken another step to promote the rise of anti-Western nationalism in Turkey. The theory on its face is benign, with the premise being that Turkey sits amid a number of "geocultural basins," such as the Middle East and the "Muslim world" (which are identical, according to the theory) and the West (Europe and the United States). Turkey can only emerge as a regional power, the thinking goes, if it establishes good ties in each of these basins and, hence, with all its neighbors. The implications of such a policy are problematic, and in the Turkish context the new order has a counterrevolutionary strain. First, instead of considering Turkey's membership in the West a given, it suggests that the country should deal equally with the West and the "Muslim world." Turkey is thus severed from its traditional pro-Western orientation, which, according to the strategic depth concept, is considered a form of alienation. The ramifications of all this cannot be overstated: the drift away from the West is the most important paradigm change in Turkish foreign policy since the beginning of the Cold War.   Artik devamini bir zahmet buradan okuyun: http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC05.php?CID=3148   Bu kurum neresi biliyor musunuz? Cevik Bir'in gorevi basindayken Washington'a gelince ugramayi ihmal etmedigi iki yerden biri olan siyonist ve neo-konservative bir dusunce kurulusu. Bu yaziyi yazan muhterem de bir Kemalist. Liberalizmden kemalizme donmus ve TSK'yi desteklemeye baslamis bir muhterem. Bunu donme de bu kurulusta calismaya basladiktan sonra oldu.   Seveceginizi umdugum bir yazi daha:   A Million Moderate Muslims on the March by Daniel Pipes New York Sun May 8, 2007 http://www.danielpipes.org/4497/a-million-moderate-muslims-on-the-march   Bu listenin dunya siyasetini cok iyi bilen muhteremlerine bu kisinin kim oldugunu anlatmama gerek yok saniyorum. En az babalarini tanidiklari gibi iyi tanimalari lazim. Tanimiyorlarsa, oturup ahkam kesmeyi biraksinlar. Bu yazi tam bir Daniel Pipes klasigi. Sizlere Daniel Pipes'dan daha cooooookkkkk guzel yazilar gececegim. Bu sahsin bir zamanlar danismanligini yapan kisinin de eski aydinlik yazarlarindan biri oldugunu da belirteyim.  Su anda ulusalci bir sitenin kose yazari. Bakin o guzel cumhuriyet mitinglerini ne guzel tanimlamis Daniel Pipes. Umarim gozunuzu acar.